top of page

Measuring and Improving Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation in the Emergency Department (MI-CARE)

  • Writer: Shahbaz Syed
    Shahbaz Syed
  • May 27
  • 2 min read

Speakers: Dr. Garrick Mok and Dr. Victoria Myers


Measuring and Improving Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation in the Emergency Department (MI-CARE)


High-quality CPR is the single most important intervention in cardiac arrest care. Yet, we often overestimate our performance. The MI-CARE project demonstrates how CPR quality can be improved in real-time through data collection, post-event debriefing, and the introduction of a dedicated CPR coach role.


The Problem:

Despite clear American Heart Association targets—depth 5–6 cm, rate 100–120/min, minimal pauses—most EDs don’t track CPR quality. Studies show large gaps between perceived and actual CPR performance. In Canada, only 12% of emergency physicians use any CPR feedback tools. Many rely on visual judgment or pulse palpation, which aren’t guideline-recommended.


The MI-CARE Approach:


  1. Measure CPR Performance

    • Built a system to collect real-time CPR data (using Zoll pucks + manual chart review).

    • Created a centralized database to analyze every ED cardiac arrest.


  2. Close the Feedback Loop

    • Real-time post-event debriefs using compression depth, rate, pause timing, and case-specific visuals.

    • Enabled frontline providers to see and discuss what worked, what didn’t.


  3. Train and Support

    • Introduced a CPR Coach role—distinct from the team lead.


      • Focuses exclusively on CPR quality: rate, depth, minimizing pauses.

      • Provides live guidance and facilitates compressor switches.


  4. Change Culture

    • Built multidisciplinary engagement: MDs, nurses, paramedics, QI and simulation leads.

    • Fostered interest in performance metrics and ownership of outcomes.

    • Staff now ask to see their data post-arrest.


Results So Far:


  • CPR quality improved significantly when using a CPR coach:

    • Without Coach: 39% in target (rate & depth)

    • With Coach: 76% in target


  • Real-time coaching reduced over-compression and improved pause management.

  • Data capture improved from 50% to >95% of all cardiac arrests.


Take-Home Message:

“You can’t improve what you don’t measure.”

CPR feedback tools, data-driven debriefs, and a CPR coach role dramatically improve performance—and are well worth the investment. MI-CARE is a scalable, team-driven model that other EDs can adopt to improve resuscitation outcomes.

 
 
 

Comments


Palais des congrès de Montréal
May 23 - 28, 2025

​​For general inquiries, please contact Jennifer Gale (jgale@caep.ca).

  • White Facebook Icon
  • White Twitter Icon
  • White Instagram Icon

© 2024 by ICEM2025.

bottom of page